diff --git a/_drafts/python-object-replacement.md b/_drafts/python-object-replacement.md
index be7432d..27584bf 100644
--- a/_drafts/python-object-replacement.md
+++ b/_drafts/python-object-replacement.md
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ b = B()
Suppose we want to replace `a` with `b`. From the demo above, we know that we
can get the Heapy set of a single object using `hp.iso()`. We also know we can
-use `.referrers` to get a set of objects that reference the given object:
+use `.referrers` to get the set of objects that reference the given object:
{% highlight pycon %}
@@ -526,8 +526,8 @@ documentation on the subject):
{% endhighlight %}
We notice that `relation` is a `Based_R_INDEXVAL` object. Sounds bizarre, but
-this tells us that `path.src` is related to `a` by being a particular index
-value of it. What index? We can get this using `relation.r`:
+this tells us that `a` is a particular indexed value of `path.src`. What index?
+We can get this using `relation.r`:
{% highlight pycon %}
@@ -537,8 +537,8 @@ a
{% endhighlight %}
-Ah ha! So now we know that `a` is equal to the reference source indexed by
-`rel`. But what is the reference source? It's just `path.src.theone`:
+Ah ha! So now we know that `a` is equal to the reference source (i.e.,
+`path.src.theone`) indexed by `rel`:
{% highlight pycon %}
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ True
{% endhighlight %}
But `path.src.theone` is just a dictionary, meaning we know how to modify it
-very easily:
+very easily:[4]
{% highlight pycon %}
@@ -560,12 +560,19 @@ True
{% endhighlight %}
-Python's documentation tells us not to modify the locals dictionary, but screw
-it, we're gonna do it anyway.
+Bingo. We've successfully replaced `a` with `b`, using a general method that
+should work for any case where `a` is in a dictionary-like object.
## Handling different reference types
-[...]
+We'll continue by wrapping this code up in a nice function:
+
+{% highlight python %}
+
+def replace(old, new):
+ pass
+
+{% endhighlight %}
### Dictionaries
@@ -638,3 +645,6 @@ is left as an exercise for the reader.
3. ^ They're actually grouped together by _clodo_
("class or dict object"), which is similar to type, but groups `__dict__`s
separately by their owner's type.
+
+4. ^ Python's documentation tells us not to modify
+ the locals dictionary, but screw that; we're gonna do it anyway.